We test each cooler individually under very similar conditions, non case, but similar time and same components for all the three coolers. The chosen program for read the temps was Core Temp 1.0 RC3 圆4 The results We run 2 wPrime 1024M for maximum stress after finish those PCMark programs and finally prime95 “In place large FFTs” for maximum heat and power use on our rig.Įach cooler was tested two times, for make us sure that reading is average and we are seeing the correct temps on our program. The Hyper 212 Evo was tested with single fan configuration and in dual fan mode always looking for gives you the best results and advice possible. After each test we waited 2 minutes to stabilize the temps on our CPU and start with the next program. We started with the rig on idle for 5 minutes, after that, used our 1 st program for stress our CPU and see what can do our cooler in load. prime95 for 15 minutes using “In place large FFTs”.
We used the following programs to stress the rig and see the performance of it: All the power saving options in BIOS was disable as well as the “OS Power Options” for avoid wrong reads on our study. Our test method was simple but always focused on get the better results according to what we need of the product, in this case, air coolers. We also used an MSI T7970 Lightning for see the space between the GPU and cooler also, we used low profile and high profile RAM to see which better option is. Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB (for space test not bench)Īll tests were done outside of a case and at similar hours in night trying to get the most similar conditions to all coolers.MSI R7970 Lightning (for space test not bench).
Motherboard: ASUS Maximus IV Gene-z/GEN3.We will test the three cooler with the same platform components, we tested this coolers at similar time of the day for try to keep the conditions very similar to all and get better results at the end. We also see here how Cooler Master now ships the coolers with fans of the SickleFlow line, leaving back the BladeMaster that arrived with the TX3 and Hyper 212+. Engine oil cap controls the LED strip with color changing function.ġ31 x 120 x 165 mm / 5.2 x 4.7 x 6.5 inchĬopper base / 55 x 0.3 mm Aluminum fins / 6 heatpiesĪll the three coolers in this review support the latest socket available in the market, even the Hyper 212 Evo arrived with the retention bracket set for socket LGA 2011.Accelerating twi high speed PWM fans deliver invincible cooling capability.Innovative “Tool free” fan boxes for easy installation of fans.Pioneering “Doble V” heatpipe deployment compresses airflow to increase efficiency under mid to high air pressures.Highly dense and tilted aluminum fins precisely engineered for impeccable cooling performance.Silent 92mm wide range PWM fan operating at only 17dBA on minimum speed.Ĭooler Master Hyper TX3 Evo Specificationsģ Direct contact heat pipes / Aluminum fins.Easily add and optional second fan with quick snap fan brackets to provide cooling performance.3 directs contact heat pipes and a base surface engineered to minimize CPU contact gaps.For this review we mark these coolers as follow:įeatures and Specifications 1. Let see what Cooler Master did in the cooler segment with this two new models. All we know that the Hyper 212+ was an excellent cooler for price/performance for a few years, today we will see if the Hyper 212 Evo can keep that line and be the new one price/performance cooler of the market.Īll we know to Cooler Master not only for his coolers, we also know than this company made very good cases for rigs as the HAF 932 and big giant HAF X as well as many fan options with and without LEDs on it. We will see the performance comparison between the new Hyper TX3 Evo, Hyper 212 Evo and the classic V6GT. Today, we will take a look at three (3) CPU coolers from Cooler Master.